I lied, here it is:

Okay, so, here we go. First, let me say, maybe I'm a bit late to this party, as you don't see too many people discussing it lately, but it's still something I've always wanted to speak my mind about. So, either click the X in the top corner, or bare with me, and try to enjoy yourself.

Gay marriage seems to be very controversial, and for the life of me I cannot figure out why. As a kid who gre up in the church (and in the south no less) it's pretty radical that I actually believe alot of the things I believe. Sure, if you'd like to take a biblical standpoint, I can see where you have a point. In the eyes of your God, it might be wrong.

But, the church lessons I was always taught preached of tolerence and understanding, of love and acceptence. Those were always the important messages. I don't remember a passage condemning homsexual marriage (though some could probably point me ther, but honestly, I don't care). But, okay, I see what you're saying. In the eyes of your church it's wrong.

So, don't let gay men and women be married in your church. There are plenty of open churches these days that don't condemn homosexuality, and if yours does, well, whatever, it's a free country. As long as you're not out burning crosses and hanging people. You're the person who'll have to answer to God for the hatred you held in your heart.

Which brings me to this...what the fuck does religion have to do with marriage? Seriously. Two athiests can go down to a courthouse and tie the knot, as long as they are of different sexes, but two men (or women) can't because it somehow belittles the things you deem sacred.

What the fuck?

God didn't tell Adam and Eve to seek out a justice of the peace, get a license, a blood test, to file thier taxes differently, none of the shit that has become associated with marriage in this country. He said: "Go forth and multiply (or be fruitful, however you want to interpret that). Where's marriage in there?

By those words God just openly allowed sex BEFORE marriage, and among relatives at that (sounds a bit like the south, no? see, we follow our Bible down here folks!). So, you're whole basis for marriage is lost from the first book of the bible, for all those that claim marriage was simply a union between man and woman intended to start a family.

Sure, go ahead, quote me all those passages you love to spit out at naysayers. I'll listen. Tell me the history of marriage throughout the entire book, and what God says about it.

To that I say marriage in this day and age is a financial institution, not a spiritual one. Again, athiests get married, as do Satan worshippers, I'm sure, so why don't you try and outlaw that? You can't, can you? It throws a kink into your entire argument.

I have a cousin who told me he wouldn't have a problem with gay marriage, except that he feels, and I quote, "gays are trying to make a mockery of the institution."

That is without a doubt the most bone-headed, idiotic statement I've ever heard.

As if straight people haven't made into a big enough joke. Celebrities get married as often as they change their clothes, divorce runs rampant throughout the country, and you can pullup to a booth in Vegas and be married in five minutes. None of these things came from gay marriage, but they are prime examples of why marriage considered as anything other than a finacial institution is a joke.

I know an almost infinite number of straight couples, but I can count on one hand the number that are happy, whether they're married or not. However, the gay couples I know can be counted on just one hand, and every one of them is happier than 95% of the straight couples I know (me included). Which makes think there might be something to being gay, but sadly I just don't find men attractive.

So, why the hell can they not get married? Because it might piss of the religious folk? Fuck 'em, they've got it coming to them. Not one single person has ever given me a valid reason gay marriage shouldn't be allowed. Aren't all men and women entitled to equality? Isn't that what this country is about. (Before someone says it, yes, I know that's an idealistic view, but it's one I have).

Yeah, I'm not making quite the point I'd hoped, and this is coming off as a bit preachy, but it's also a subject I'm very passionate about. Interesting side note, I was told that if I support gay marriage and think the war was a bad idea, then I must (and the MUST was emphasized) vote Democratic in the upcoming election.

First, I've never voted, and don't intend to until the system and the parties are completely done away with. Which is another reason I was told I MUST vote. Second, just because I believe certain things in alignment with Democrats, doesn't make me a Democrat. I see eye-to-eye with alot of Republican views as well, but I'm not gonna run out an align myself with those idiots either.

Bottom line, marriage, as I said, is a financial institution, one any couple should be allowed access to. Others who agree with my statements may disagree with that and say that marriage is a display of devotion to your loved one, a commitment to building something together, but I disagree. If you need recognition from the government to make a commitment to someone you love then you're far beyond help.

-L

Smallworld

Tonight was the season premier of everyone's favorite teenaged superhero. Seriously, if you're not watching this show, you're missing out on some great TV. Sure it's filled with soap opera style plots, more teen angst than a John Hughes film (well, maybe not...), and probably a cast too sexy to even be allowed to be on television, much less play characters fanboys drool over (fangirls too, I'd imagine that works both ways, hell, multiple ways). but, it's still the best thing to happen to Supes since...well, since those nice Jewish kids created him.

Seriously. If you are watching this show and you're a comic book reader, you have to admit that this is the most interesting the character has been since he died oh those many years ago. And he wasn't that interesting then.

So, tonight we got to see the introduction of Lois Lane, find out that everyone isn't dead, see a bald Lionel luthor, and have even more secrets thrown our way. There were a handful of great moments, like clark wearing the red blanket, and Margot Kidder (in response to a query about her interest in Dr. Swan, who'splayed by Chris Reeve.) saying "In another life."

However, the flirting over the dead cousins/friends grave thing was a bit retarded (another word I meant to throw into my diatribe about how words take on different meanings...but, I'm getting off point). Yes, we all know she isn't dead, but it did seem to be a bit....dark, maybe? Not sure what word I'm looking for.

All in all though, a great episode. The black kryptonite seemed to be a handy plot point, but everything in this show is far too coincidental to feel grounded in the least bit. It's really part of the charm. Here's hoping the season just gets better from here.

Hope to have a review up later, possibly tomorrow, and I'm going to talk about one of those "important" things I mentioned a few days ago. Namely gay marriage. That'll either bring you back or send you screaming, either way, I'll be talking about it tomorrow. Well, lecturing would be a better word I suppose.

-L

One Down...

And far too many to go. This one's from quite a few weeks ago, but it was still a good read.

Bullsesy: Greatest Hits #1 $2.99 (Marvel Comics)

Creative team: Daniel Way, Steve Dillon, with colors by Dan Kemp, letters by Randy Gentile, and a cover by Mike Deodato, Jr.

What's it about? Bullseye has finally been apprehended, and this time the government intends to keep him that way. Unfortunately before they got him he'd stolen some nukes, and now Agents Hoskins and Baldry have to find out where the nukes are. Which, naturally, means interrogating one of the world's most dangerous men.

Why you should be reading it: Well, let's start with the obvious reason, the art. Steve Dillon is one of the mediums finest, he's proven time and again how good he really is. This is no different. The pages flow as well as they possibly can, and while it might not be Frank Quietly/WE3-ish, it's still pretty damned good. Dillon doesn't draw any two characters the same, and you've gotta love his facial expressions. His Bullseye looks menacing, even though he's wearing nothing but a hospital gown. Next, there's the writing. Until now I've only known Way from his work on Venom, which I've mostly loved. He also wrote a creator owned book at Marvel titled Gun Theory and was supposed to be writing an Ant-Man series for the MAX line, not sure if that one ever made it to the stands rhough. Anyone have any idea? This book, however, feels verey different from his work on Venom. Yes, they're both psychopaths, but where as Venom feels more like out-and-out hooror-ish (is that a word?), Bullseye feels more like a suspense. For instance, the build up before we actually see Bullseye is fantastic, thw two agents talking about the various misdeeds the man has been known for. It's an old plot tactic, but it's one that works well, especially here. The dialogue is excellent as well, and you can almost feel the hatred these people have for their prisoner fuming off the page. Then we finally get to our main character, and it's everything we could have hoped. Even his little "origin" story seems crazy, and you're not quite sure if he's telling the truth, with that sly smile he has on his face. It just great stuff. Theother reason is, it'sBullseye. Who doesn't love maniacle, psychopathic lunatics with uncanny abilities? Especially well written and drawn ones!

-L

Trilogy Tuesday

Looks like the event geeks everywhere have been waiting for has finally happened. The holy trilogy gets its first DVD release. Why do I say first? Look at how many VHS editions were released, so I can't possibly expect this to be the last we see of Lucas and his remastered shit. That's exactly what it is folks. Shit.

I could stand here all day and bitch about the fact that the man ruined his one and only masterpiece, but that's not true. The films were never his to begin with. At least, the original films weren't. This crap we're getting now, yeah, that's a George Lucas film.

The plot is a mish mash of various things, most notably akira Kurasawa's Hidden Forstress, and Lucas didn't even direct the best film of the series, and only gets credit for the story, not the actual script. The third film, Reurn of the Jedi, is the same as the second, Lucas niether directs nor gets credit for the script, just the story.

The man isn't getting a dime from me folks, and I feel for all you suckers coughing up good money for this shiny dog-turd he's selling.

You're better off buying either one of the other notable releases coming out this week, Mr. show: Season 4, or Mad TV: Season 1. At least they're intentionally funny.

-L

Toys!

Haven't talked much about my other little habit lately, so, here we go.

I picked up one of the Transformers: Alternators series, namely Hound, who comes as a scaled down replica of a Jeep Wrangler (he was a military jeep in the original cartoon, I believe) and he's pretty damned awesome. The Alternators series hasn't really impressed me up until this point, the robot modes just look awkward, so I've stayed away (actually, I've stayed away from almost all of the new Transformers series), but this one just looked good. He looks almost exactly like his original form from the toon in both car and robot mode. So, until they put out a Bumblebee, this will be the last TF buy for awhile...I think.

The other toy on the list is Art Asylum's new C3 constuction line, featuring Batman and Superman. I picked up the Batman & Robin pack, with the Batmobile. I had high hopes for it, and it completely let me down. Robin's hair fell off, Batman's feet won't stay on, the hands are awkward, and the Batmobile is too small for Batman. Not to mention the color scheme on the box isn't the one you get. Major disappointment here. I'd be curious to know if this was an oddity, or if they're all this shitty. Maybe I'll pick up another pack just to see, but at ten bucks I expected it to at least stay together. If anyone else bought one, let me know what you think, or if you're selling them, let me know if you got any complaints. Parents, I'd be weary of buying this for your kids, perhaps the Marvel MiniMates would be a better investment, or some good old fashioned Legos.

That might be it for the day folks. Big thanks to Mike over at Progressive Ruin. Got my books today man, and I'm uber psyched about Howard the Duck.

-L

Getting Fused

One of the GN's I got from ADD this past week, and I got the chance to read it last night. So, here's the rundown:

Fused: Canned Heat TPB $12.95 (Dark Horse/Rocket Comics)

Creative Team: Steve Niles, Paul Lee, Brad Rader, and Ben Templesmith, with an intro by Dan Wickline and pin-ups by David Helfrey, Scott A. Keating, Patrick Clarke and Ashley Wood.

What's it about? (Taken straight fron Niles' website: http://www.steveniles.com/store.htm ) Mark Haggerty was a promising young robotics engineer until his body became fused with an experimental robot suit during a routine testing session. Trapped inside a body that’s not his own, and suddenly the unwilling pawn in a deadly struggle between obsessive egos and misguided military forces, Mark’s life is forever changed. With his human body consumed more each day by the Cy-bot suit, and the most dangerous elements in the world closing in around him, Mark’s only recourse is to keep fighting—until he gets his life back.
Collecting the Fused series originally published by Image

Why you should read it: Well, first of all, it's Steve Niles, and he's one of the better writers working in the medium today. Unlike most, he manages to bring something new to the table with every project. His 30 Days of Night was the second coming of great horror comics, he's writing a zombie book, he writes mystery/horror books (okay, yeah, those all fall into the horror category, but they aren't all about the same thing), and then there's Fused, something far, far outside his other horror-centric titles. I've already told you the basic lot for the series, and really, there's not much beyond that. The introduction (which it fantastic) gives us a brief historyof Niles' trouble with this book, going so far as to call it cursed (Niles calls it cursed himself). I think I can agree with that statement. It's not a bad book, not by any means, but it lacks alot of things, mostly consistency. You'll notice three different artists for the trade, and given that it was a miniseries, that's alot. You'll also note that it says it was originally published by Image, and Dark horse published the trade. It struck me as funny. Back to consistency. In serialized fiction, it's a pretty important element, and I can't help but think that if I'd read this series by issues it wouldn't have been quite as bad. Especially since there seemed to be large gaps between them. The art, however, isn't the only thing that could have been better (well, the consistency of the art at least), the story feels off. We're left with quite a few questions, given how much we actually care about the series and it's characters. The back story about who Mark really works for seems vague, as does the back story for the people chasing them. We're not given alot of time with Mark and his wife, so when he worries about her we don't really feel the urgency that he does. My biggest complaint is the introduction of the Implementers, who end up serving almost no purpose. It felt like the old Image books where Youngblood would show up just because, and you're left scratching your head. Overall the book felt rushed, no matter how long it was between issues. This might be one of the rare books that only read great in floppy form, because the trade makes it feel like the comic book equivelent of a quilt. Bits and pieces of things stitched together in an attempt to make an even larger thing. Unfortunately these pieces were oddly shaped and we're left with many, many holes.

I've got tons more to talk about, but, like always, I'm strapped for time. I've just finished Niles' Freaks of the Heartland #5 along with the latest Fantastic Four issue, so look for some thoughts on those later.

EDIT: I just added Haloscan comments, you can't miss 'em, so this should make it easier for those who actually comment! Ignore the first little comment line...I haven't been able to get it removed yet. Anyone know how?

-L

Now, I Finally Have Something to Say

And, to some it might seem stupid, to others it might seem offensive, and other might not give a damn, but I'm gonna say it.

Dorian talked about the use of the word "gay" a few days ago, specifically in Robert Kirkman's invincible. Now, while I don't read the book, and completely agree with what Dorian is saying, I do believe there are two sides to every story. So, here, now, I'm going to argue against Dorian's point.

Alot of words like this (gay, queer, nigger {yeah, there I said it} and even negro) were basically assigned (is that even the right word?) to a group of people by people who felt they were better than the people they assigned them too. They began to use them as derogatory terms to describe that group of people. However, each one of those words had a far different meaning before then.

Nigger and negro were both slang used to describe something black (you can look into the origins of just about any widely spoken language, and somewhere you'll find a similar term being used as an adjective for a dark or black color. But, that's really beside the point, just something I wanted to address while I'm talking about word origins.

Side note here, before someone says, "what about fag?" Alot of people seem to be under the impression that the term fag was taken from the British, where they use it in reference to cigarettes, however, the term they use is derived from the word fag-end, which ironically comes from the original definition of the word fag, which was to hang loose, or flap. If you look into word origins you'll find that the British use of the word fag is actually referring to the way a cigarette hangs from your mouth. The derogatory, more American use is derived from the word faggot, and I honestly have no idea where that term comes from, and any definition you find, or that I've found, it's only meaning is to describe a male homosexual. But, I'm getting off track.

Gay was originally (or, until it became associated with homosexuality) used to describe someone that was quite happy. How or why it became associated with homosexuality, I haven't the slightest. Near as I've been able to find it was originally adopted (as all the other were) as a derogatory term, meant to be hurtful towards the receiving party.

Queer was originally used as a term to describe something odd, or not right. Given that it too was meant to be hurtful, it's not hard at all to tell how it became associated with homosexuality.

Now, I've got a feeling that if Kirkman had wrote "This is so queer." we might not be having this discussion, so I'm going to leave that one aside, but like the other terms, it's something I just wanted to address while I was on the subject.

Okay, so, like I said, I pretty much agree with what Dorian is saying, but it was a word that originally had a different meaning, and somehow became associated with a specific group of people, and was thought to be a bad term. Much like the black community, you have to give the homosexual community credit for taking a word that was originally meant to offend, and using it as a term of edearment (usually) between each other.

Unlike the "N" word, the slang usage of gay doesn't have the same history of torment and oppression behind it, even if it was adapted as a term of hatred, hopefully everyone can agree with me there. There's also a theory that the word gay wasn't derogatory at all, but that it was adopted by homosexuals as a sort of "code." I don't personally buy into that, but it is an alternate theory, and like I said, two sides to every story.

Where was I?

Honestly, I don't really know....

What it boils down to is the fact that in the English language, especially in America, it has never been uncommon to take a word and prescribe it a different meaning. Cool, bad, sick, tight, fat; all recent examples, and all readily used by a lot of younger people. Granted none of them have ever been used as a term of endearment between a specific group of people, but that's not to say they never will either.

Teens are constantly creating new slang, but just because they use a word one way doesn't mean they are ignorign it'sother meanings, or attempting to infer that it's other meaning is somehow wrong (see, depending on how you read this sentence, I could be saying two different things).

"That's bad."

It's a sentence that can mean two different things. If kids are now using "gay" to describe something they think is stupid or weird, well, that doesn't mean they are implying that homosexuals are stupid or weird to them, but they've taken a wordone generation has been using to mean something, and using it to mean something else. It is just a word, and in the end that's all it is. We may not like it, but it's something I don't think yelling at people will change it, every new generation does it.

I'm a fat white guy and if the term "fat cracker" suddenly became popular for describing something else, well, I guess I'll just have to get over it.

Like I said, I agree, and completely see your point there Dorian, but it's out of our hands once we become adults. Or, at least reasonable facsimiles. We're never going to understand the slang the kids are using these days.

Hope I didn't piss anyone off with any of this, honestly, that was not my intent, and if I have, apologies. But, in situations like this I think it's important to always look at someone elses perspective, no matter what. You'll be amazed at what you find. And that's not directed at Dorian, but everyone. Offenders and offendees alike.

Okay, I've droned on enough. Got some comics in the mail today, much thanks to Mr. Doane, so maybe I'll have more to talk about tomorrow. Night folks.

-L

Yet another storm

I'm glad I don't live in Florida. But, I do live in Georgia, which means we get some of the aftermath (winds and rain, sometimes tornadoes) from those damned hurricanes. So, these next few days are predicted to be rough, and considering how easily my power goes out, it's likely I won't be able to post anything for at least two days or so. On top of that, bad weather = me working more hours, so I doubt I'd even have the time to post.

I've watched a few movies (actually about five) in the last few days that I've been wanting to discuss, three of them action films, which was going to lead me to something that was being discussed on Tom's blog the other day. Looks like I'd just be beating the dead horse now, so I'm going to try and formulate them into something else.

It's also occured to me that I don't really ever say anything of importance on my blog, and as self-defeating as that sounds, it's not really for lack of trying. I've become mainly a review blog, which is never what I inteded to be, so I'm going to try and change that.

Not that I won't do reviews, but just that I'm going to try and devote one post a week to actually saying something, so it doesn't sound like all I do is read comics and watch movies. Wait...that is all I do.

Picked up a ton of stuff at my local shop this week, and even went diving in the fifty...or is that fitty?...cent bins. I'm expecting some comics from both ADD and Mike, provided they both got my payment, haven't heard back from either one, so guys, if you're reading this, lemme know if everything's kosher.

I did want to talk about some TV watching, but decided nothing was really that noteworthy. I missed Father of the Pride and Scrubs this week, which was a downer, but, they'll rerun 'em...well, they'll rerun Scrubs. I lood for the other show to end up cancelled, even though it isn'treally a bad show, it just lacks direction.

Also, just to show how computer-retarded I am, I just mastered mp3 technology about two days ago, and I must say, being able to store massive amounts of music on one disc is friggin' awesome.

I also wanted to get in on Tom's Family Guy discussion from awhile back, but missed the boat on that as well. Despite what some say, and no matter how few gags the show actually has, I've yet to find an episode that doesn't make me laugh at least foure or five times.

And, since I have to be up at the crack of dawn tomorrow, I'm gonna leave you with that. Here's hoping I have power when I get home from work! Oh, and cable!

-L

A Review and Links

Plenty o'stuff around the net to look at today.

First up, Alan's got a review of the two Superman Adventures trades (or mini-trades, whatever you wanna call 'em) written by Mark Millar. Check it out, over at the CBG, link's to the right.

Tony Whitt's new Comicscape column is up, and it's always worth a read through, just click on the Cinescape.com link.

Tom has some thoughts on the Punisher film that all but echo my own feelings. So go give him a look.

Identity Disc #4 $2.99 (Marvel Comics)

Creative Team: Rob Eodi, John Higgins, with inks by Sandu Florea, colors by A. Crossley, and letters by Dave Sharpe

What's it about? A team of villians is blackmailed into obtaining the coveted Identity Disc from A.I.M. headquarters. Hijinks ensue as they don't get along and fumble the plan.

Why you should be reading it: Well, this issue was actually not half bad, but, like the Punisher, I think it may just be dulling my senses so that each issue seems less crappy. The plot is some parts Clue and some parts The Usual Suspects, and it's in no way as inventive as either of those, or as clever. Cliche's run rampant throughout, and while there are a few laughs to be had, other than Deadpool and the Vulture, all the characters seem to be misinterpreted. Were Rodi using lower tier villians (yes, these aren't the lowest villians in the MU, Stilt-Man anyone?) this might have been great. Instead we get treated to an odd little book where everything feels a bit off, and no one seems to be who they are. If that makes any sense. The art is serviceable at best. Other than the way Sabertooth is drawn I haven't had any major complaints, but it doesn't fit the mood of the story. Just one man's opinion though. At least we get to see who the hell was behind this next issue.

-L

The Late Night List

Sigh...yet another long workday....

Dazed And Confused

A classic. And it's a Special Edition release, including some new bonus features.

Diff'rent Strokes: The Complete First Season

Proof that the TV nostalgia has gone too far.

Fast Times At Ridgemont High

Another classic in special edition format.

G.I. Joe: Valor vs. Venom

I think they put this out just for Dorian. The tagline says "Still fighting Cobra, 20 years later!" Not really, but fighting the same war and getting nowhere for years on end often makes me think of our own govenrment. So, at least no one can say it's not a realistic concept.

Jem & the Holograms: Season 3, Part 1

I know somewhere there are 25 year old men buying this crap. Ooh, look, a G.I. Joe movie!

Man On Fire

I'm dying to see this.

Scooby Doo 2: Monsters Unleashed

Repeat after me, "This isn't a bad movie!"

THX 1138

I think Lucas digitally replaced everyone that was originally in the film...with himself. Seriously, he should just be allowed to print his own money. Idiots will buy anything with his name on it. I have heard this is a good film though.

I shall be back tomorrow with a review or two.

-L

Come Monday

And I'm still playing catch up.

First and foremost, I've updated my fiction blog, so do check that out if you're bored. Second, I'm working on trying to get a different comments box, as Bloggers is just troublesome. I've noticed a ton of folk using Haloscan, and I'm going to attempt to try that, we'll see how much my skills have grown when I attempt to add it to the html...

Next, some reviews:

Back to the Future: TheComplete Trilogy

Director: Robert Zemeckis

Writer(s): Bob Gale, Robert Zemeckis

Cast: Michael J. Fox, Christopher Lloyd, Lea Thompson, Tom Wilson

What's it about? The adventures of Marty McFly and Dr. Emmett (Sp?) Brown, as they travel through time, bith into the past and into the future. If you need to know more than that, you really have been living uder a rock haven't you?

Why you should see it: Or in the case of the DVD set, why you should own it/rewatch it. First of all, it's one of the best series of family films out there. Yes, the language can be a bit on the vulgar side, and there are some mild sexual situations (especially in the first film), but, nothing's too horrible, depending on the age of your children, and I suppose how firm you are about sheltering them.

All of that aside, there's really alot to enjoy here. Everyone will tell you that the second and third of the trilogy don't hold up to the first, but, seriously, how could you expect them too. The first film was lightning in a bottle, and it's almost impossible to catch it twice, and impossible to hit it all three times. Still, the inventiveness of the second film makes up for what it lacks. It's truly unique to see something like this, a film that not only uses time travel as a plot point, but manages to travel withing it's own universe, so that in the second film you get to see the first film from a whole new perspective.

As for the third, well, who doesn't want to be a cowboy?

Not to mention the fact that the second and third were filmed back-to-back, a very grueling task, which likely resulted in the lower quality. Still, I believe the sequels are vastly underrated, and stand the test of time well. The charatcers still hold up, as do the jokes, and the special effects aren't so bad either.

Now, the DVD set has tons of extras on it, including two commentary tracks for each film (one of them is a Q&A session with Zemeckis and Gale) a few documentaries about the making of each film, a trivia track on each film, make-up and special effects tests, two music videos, production notes, outtakes, and some deleted scenes.

The most interesting thing? Zemeckis' comment when asked if he was going to digitally remove some mistakes from the pictures. Not sure if he was directly speaking about George Lucas, but he gets his point across on his feelings about that.

Like I said, the films hold up surprisingly well, even if they are obviously dated films. Considering the sequels were never even planned on, it makes me wonder what would've been different if they knew ahead of time. Zemeckis goes on record, saying "we never would have put the girl in the car."

This is a great DVD set, the picture quality is excellent, and the fact that they didn't remove any of the "warts" (as they call them) makes it that much more pleasing. This is one everyone should own. If you can't at least enjoy the first, then I honestly don't know what's wrong with you.

Oooh, time for some comics!

The Punisher #11 $2.99 (Marvel Comics)

I'm gonna skip all the usual stuff and just say that the book has picked up a bit, but Ennis still hasn't impressed me here. I'm finishing this arc, and starting the next one, and after that who knows? The art is serviceable at best, and the plot just feels forced. Maybe there really was a statement to make about the I.R.A. and their cause, but it must have gotten lost in there somewhere. The action isn't nearly what you'd expect, and with the exception of McGinty about to getcarved to bits, there's almost no satisfaction to be found here. Right now I'm wishing I stuck to buying Ennis in trades, especially on this book.

That's it for today folks. I'll be back tomorrow with the list!

-L

SundaySundaySunday!!!

And it can mean only one thing. The triumphant return of Atlanta Falcon Football. Well, maybe not triumphant, but, hey, they're back!

Yeah, you don't meet too many fanboy's who happen to be football fanatics as well. It's an odd existemce that I live. Anyway, since I will likely be tied up the rest of the day watching the greatest sport in the world, and cheering on my fantasy team (The Devestators; they can find a way to make even football geeky, isn't it amazing!) I thought I'd finish up a review first. So, here it is!

X-Force #2 $2.99 (Marvel Comics)

Creative Team: Rob Liefeld, Fabian Nicieza, with colors by Matt Yackey, and letters by Rus Wooton

What's it about? Beats the hell out of me. Cable is attempting to reform his paramilitary squad to face yet another futuristic foe. That's pretty much all I got out of last issue.

This issue: Ummm...Cable attempts to reform his...oh forget it. This issue we see the rest of the old team (minus Syrin, which I found a bit odd) all but refuse to help Cable. Except for Sam, who's in Kentucky, and ends up being visited by someone else form the future claiming that Cable will be responsible for some tragedy or another. Oh, and it turns out Sam is once again some sort of "savior" or something. So when the rest of the gang find out Sam might be in trouble, they naturally go running to help. Bodyslide, end of issue.

Why you should be reading it: You really shouldn't. The reasons I am are about as dumb as they come. First, the writing isn't terrible. It's not. In fact there are a few moments where it's a tad bit on the witty sad, just a tad though. Of course I never found Rob and Fabes work together to be that atrocious to begin with. There's obviously an effort on someones part to drop hints at what these characters have been doing lately, but there's huge gaps between last issue and this one. Which just makes you scratch your head. You can easily fill in the blanks, but in today's slow-paced comic world it's a bit puzzling. Of course, I often complain about slow pace as well. Typical fanboy bitching....

The art, you ask? Well, that's where the book is really failing. The art isn't even up to par with last issue...and that's just sad. Liefeld art is pretty substandard enough, but bad Liefeld art is just awful. On top of that we didn't get the obligatory fight scene. This issue was a bit disappointing. Anyone that knows me knows I have a love for bad thing, be they movies or comics, but when you're writing something you know isn't exactly "great" have some fun with it. I'd call X-Force the Showgirls of the comic world. It's one of those things you shouldn't watch, but it's just so darned fun. Except for the art, personally I'd love to see a great artist on the book. Igor Kordey maybe. Something like that might bring about the end of civilization as we know it.

Later folks.

-L

Why do they call it the blues?

Beats me, but Bluesman by Rob Vollmar and Pablo Vallejo promises to be one of the best, and most inmportant comics work this year, possibly ever. The duo previously worked on The Castaways from Absence of Ink press, and it's probably one of the greatest stories ever written, and shows just what this medium is capable of.

ADD over at the Galaxy has been talking about Bluesman for some time, and I'm finally getting in on it. It can (and should) be pre-ordered from the recent Previews catalog, and according to Alan, can be found at the Absence of Ink website.I can't find it there just yet, but I could be losing my mind.

There's plenty of stuff worth buying outside of Bluesman including the previously mentioned The Castaways. O and there's also Forlorn Funnies (which gave us another of the greatest works this year, Mother, Come Home. So, here's the link: Absence of Ink Comic Press - Home

Check it out, buy something, and if you find the Bluesman solicitation, let me know!

For more on Bluesman and Rob Vollmar, check out Alan's Five Questions at Neswarama: http://www.newsarama.com/Creator_Owned/Vollmar/Vollmar.htm

Hopefully I'll get to some reviews later.

-L

The Resurrection

In more ways than one. I'm finally back after a hiatus that lasted far too long. Hope everyone's still with me. There's a ton of things to talk about, including almost two weeks worth of comics, movies, and even some TV. First though, I'm gonna talk about a movie I put off for awhile.

Alien: Resurrection

Director: Jean-Pierre Juenet

Writer: Joss Whedon (That's right fanboys, your savior wrote this.)

Cast: Sigourney Weaver, Winona Rider, Dominique Pinon, Ron Perlman, Gary Dourdan, Michael Wincott, Kim Flowers, Dan Hedaya, J.E. Freeman, Brad Dourif, Raymond Cruz, Leland Orser

What's it about? It seems 200 years have passed since Ripley comitted suicide to "save" the human race from the aliens, and now a few scientists have found a way to bring her back. Yay for cloning. After repeated attempts (seven) they finally succeed, and when she (rapidly, as the aliens do) grows into adult-hood, they remove the queen embryo from inside her. Now, with the help of a few...let's call them space pirates...they have the bodies needed to host a new litter of aliens. What they don't realize is that just becasue the aliens look, well, animalistic, doesn't mean they're unintelligent. So, the creatures get out of their holding cells, and proceed to kill everyone on board the space station. Oh, and it's headed to Earth.

Why you should watch it: There aren't alot of reasons to watch it really. I remember really hating the film after seeing it in theatres, but after going over all the extra features on the DVD and giving it another look, I've found that isn't so much the case. For all those that have seen it, give it another look, considering who Whedon is these days, and the fan following he has, you might be surprised at how different you see it. Especially after I try to clear a few things up.

Until the DVD, I had no idea that this was a French director. None. Which shows how lazy I truly am. It's easy to sit on the couch and denounce a film, but once you "meet" the director and begin to realize his intentions, and especially if he seems like a nice enough guy, it becomes increasingly difficult. So, having listened to Jean-Pierre talk about Resurrection, I've found myself not hating it. It's still not a good film, but I've never been one for French cinema anyway.

And that's exactly what this is. It's a French film (more specifically a dark comedy), made with American money, and mostly with American actors. Jean-Pierre had never directed outside of France, so when Hollywood came calling, he naturally jumped on the project. To this day (as he says repeatedly) he has been unable to figure out why they chose him. Looking at his filmography, I have to agree. For a studio looking to revive a dead franchise to choose someone virtually unknown in the states, someone without the slightest background in this type of work, is almost ridiculous.

So, you've got to give credit to 20th Cent. Fox for taking a massive chance with their choice...or do you? Considering the other problems of all three films, I'm assuming what the studio wanted was someone they could instruct better. Scott, Cameron, and Fincher all had major issues with the studio, Jean-Pterre never had a single problem. Why? Because he firmly believed he was making their film, that he was just another hired hand. If they said change, he changed. That, above all else, is the biggest problem of this film. Theother three fought for their vision, where as Jean-Pierre never really had one in the first place.

Yes, there are a few things he can claim as his own, a few ideas he came up with, and for the most part they add a bit of quirkiness to an otherwise lifeless film. Add on top of that that the movie was made state-side (not in London as the previous three, and that Jean-Pierre spoke not a lick of English, and that adds more fuel to the fire. There are times when you can clearly see that the acting is suffering from bad communication with the director (not bad directing mind you). Next we have the writing. Now, while everyone seems content to hail Whedon as one of the greatest writers in quite sometime, I don't buy it. His dialogue seems over the top, and cliched as hell. That stuff works in comics, but on film it just doesn't fly.His plots have huge holes in them (at least they do here) and he doesn't seem to have full grasp of the characters he's writing. Now, for fans of Whedon, watch the film again, and keep in mind about the directing, I'm sure you'll enjoy it a wee bit more, if not downright like it. Next, the acting. Here is where it all comes together. Mediocre, and sometimes just plain bad writing, mixed with a director who can barely communicate, and all of a sudden we start to self distruct. None of the actors are bad, but they all seem lost in the roles, not knowing exactly what they should be doing, not sure about how to deliver their lines. It's a recipe for destruction. The only thing about the film that is a complete success is the cinematography, and we have Darius Khondji (se7en) to thank for that. If you watch the film on mute it looks brilliant.

So, to sum it up, it's really hard to hate the film. Everyone (except the studio) had the best of intentions, and really did try their best to make a good film. Unfortunately, with all those elements I mentioned, and (I think) without the struggle the other films had, this movie lacks one basic element. Soul. You just cannot feel for these characters, and in the end you begin to hope that the aliens kill them all.

That's pretty much it for now. I've got aton of books to go over, but considering how touchy my connection's been, I'm gonna call it a day before I lose everything.

-L

Bad to worse

No power, no cable, lotsa wind and rain. No updates for awhile folks. Stupid hurricane. At least I ain't in Florida!

-L

Getting that itch again...

Which can only mean one thing.

Scratch #4 $2.95 (DC Comics)

Creative team: Sam Kieth, with letters by Phil Balsman, and colors by Alex Sinclair

What's it about? A werewolf. And a bunch odd weird kids. And disgruntled townsfolk, with pitchforks and torches. And an odd young girl as well. And, somehow, Batman.

This issue: We find out the sheriff is also a bit weird. Well, a lot weird. We get to see Scratch take a few odd forms, and Batman finally shows up.

Why you should be reading it: Well, this is another one I'm sticking with solely because it's Sam Keith. The narrative flow is all wrong, and I can't really grasp what the hell is going on. So, in essence, you probably shouldn't be reading this. However, it looks fucking gorgeous.

More later folks, apologies for the lack of updates. The bad weather headed this way is keeping me busy at work, I pulled a 12 hour shift today, so I haven't the energy for anything else. More tomorrow. I swear.

-L

Another One Bites The Dust


Forsaken #1 $2.95 (Image Comics)

Creative Team: Carmen Treffiletti, Kristian Donaldson, with inks by Nick Zagami, and letters by Lithium Pro

What's it about? Apollo Delk is hired by a mysterious group of people...to do something...along with several other people. Turns out he might end up getting them killed.

Why you should be reading it: Hmmm...I'm not so sure you should be. ADD beat me to the punch over at CBG and reviewed this, and he hit the nailon the head. This is pretty much an averagebook, and the writing is very cliched. I loved the art, and it elevated the dialogue a bit, so it may be worth picking up the second issue, and maybe a third, but I can't see this holding my interest longer than that. Well, unless it just gets better.

One; it really is the loneliest number

And that's how many reviews I have for you. One. Sorry folks, it's been a long day, but at least it's a good one!

Y, the Last Man #26 $2.95 (DC/Vertigo)

Creative Team: Brian K. Vaugh, Pia Guerra, with inks by Jose Marzan, Jr., color by Zylonol, and letters by Clem Robbins

What's it about? It's every man's fantasy turned into a complete and total nightmare. Yorick and his pet monkey, Ampersand, are the last serviving males on the entire planet, and along with a mysterios government agent, and a doctor who thinks she can find out what went wrong, they make their way across country, in the hopes of finding some answers.

This issue: This month we get a tale about Yorick's sister, and one time would-be assassin, Hero. While the pieces seem random at first, once we get into the tale, Vaughn begins to sow them together nicely. We getglimpses of her childhood, her reaction to the plague, her reunion with her mother, her first meeting with the Amazon's, her first sexual experiance, her deprogramming, and her glimpse at the first male born into this new world.

Why you should be reading it: Because for over two years now it has been one of the best damn books on the shelves. Honestly, it was so good when I picked up the first issue, I thought it would surely be cancelled inside of a year. Things like this don't often last, but here we are, 25 issues later, and still going strong. The story has moved a bit slow at times, but it's so well written that it's usually not a bother. And if Vaughn lacks anything in his writing skill (he doesn't) Guerra certainly makes up for it with the art. Not only is this one of the best written books on the shelf, it's also one of the most beautiful. This is the most consistent book being published today, well, most consistently excellent, I believe some X-Book has the current lock on consistently bad. This is something everyone should be reading. Well, not the kids. Buy this book and keep it going for another two years.

-L

Well, I got one of them!

Haven't had a chance to get any reading done, and I didn't get to finishe the bonus materials for Alien: Resurrection, but I did watch The Girl Next Door.

The Girl Next Door

Director: Luke Greenfield (the Animal)

Writer(s): David Wagner, Brent Goldberg, Stuart Glumberg

Actors: Emile Hirsch, Elisha Cuthbert

What's it about? Hirsch plays Matthew Kidman, typical high school geek, about to graduate, with no fond memories of his four years in Hell. Cuthbert plays the girl whol moves in next door, Danielle, who just happens to be a former porn star, unbeknownst to Matt. He falls in love, and she falls in love, they overcome her chosen profession, along with a few other typical obstacles, and have some laughs along the way.

Why you should watch it: Well, it's a pretty typical movie, except the cast and direction bring it up to another level. Greenfield's previous big outing was The Animal which wasn't a bad film, for what it was, but this flik should bring Greenfield into the majors of comedy. There are some outright genuine laughs, and plenty of feel-good moments, along with T&A galore. Yesterday I watched a movie that was awful, and attempted to hide it with sex. This movie does the exact opposite, adding T&A where none is really needed. The script wassolid enough to support itself, but I think the studio might have felt like it needed the extra boost to drive in horny teens. Of course I watched the unrated version, so I don't know what was added in really. Still, I found it a bit overdone in parts. Yeah, she's a porn star, I suppose you have to have some nudity. I'm getting away from the subject. Nudity aside, this film holds it own, and is better than any of the teen movies to come down the pike in quite along time. That's not saying much, but really, it's a good movie. Mostimpressive was Greenfields use of music during the course of the film. Scores are usually best at holding a mood, but here we have pop and rock songs in place of traditional instumental music, and it works brilliantly. The acting is impressive, and like I said, the plot keeps you entertained. If you're looking to get a good laugh and a smile, you can't go wrong with this.

Also, there's a new Chapter up on my Last Stand page, so please, if you're bored, check it out. Or, check it out if you're not bored. Just check it out!

-L

Cruisin'

It's not a Sunday afternoon, but there's still alot of stuff out there to see.

Tony Whitt has a new Comicscape column up at Cinescape.com. He talks about this weeks releases, and has an in-depth look at DC's Humanoids line currently bombarding shelves. I'll have to look into picking some of those up. Check it out: http://www.cinescape.com/

There's also an Avengers #500 review, and a Sandman: Endless Nights review.

Mike Sterling has an interesting cover up at http://www.progressiveruin.com/ Funny stuff.

Speaking of covers: http://www.postmodernbarney.com/ Check out Dorian's brilliant idea on the man that shouyld have been Hush.

Near Mint Heroes has a massive update, bound to keep you busy for quite awhile, it's a linkfest of its own, take a gander: http://www.nearmintheroes.org/

Johnny Bacardi is back from yet another NYC trip. Welcome back Johnny. Not much happening in his world, but check it out: http://johnnybacardi.blogspot.com/

And, once again, CBG is having a celebration, so please, go make em feel good by running up their hit counter. http://www.comicbookgalaxy.com/ There's tons of great stuff to read there, sure to keep you busy for hours.

Neilalien has a link to the new Doc Strange series, a full preview of the issue, so hit him up as well: http://www.neilalien.com/

Since it's Wednesday, and that means new comics, I'll be back later with some review. Actually, there's a few movies I'm gonna talk about too, Alien: Resurrection and The Girl Next Door. One's great and one sucks. I'll leave you with the suspense.

-L

Some Reviews and the Return of an Old Favorite

First, head on over to CBG and check out D. emerson edyy's latest words of wisdom, How to Quit Reading Comics. Great, hilarious stuff, and sadly, he's completely on the ball with it. Also, today is the offical CBG anniversary, so, one more Happy Anniversary! to you guys over there.

Next, a review:

Heroes for Hope Starring the X-Men $1.50 (Cover)

Creative Team: It'd be easier to name the people who weren't involved.

What's it about? The X-Men go up against an entity they just can't seem to fight, one who can attack them mentally. Turns out it's some kind of force as old as manking who feeds on misery. It's a pretty substandard story overall, but the point of the story isn't lost, and in fact you pretty much get beat over the head with it.

Why you should read it: Well, the art is pretty great, and the dialogue is well written, but considering the talent involved it'd be hard for it to be horrible. There's a great cover by Art adams, and a Jim Starlin does a back cover that's impressive enough. It's pretty standard X-Men stuff from the mid-80's, with great dialogue and good art, great art in some places. I found it in a quarter bin, and that makes it well worth it, but I believe the guide price is between five and ten bucks, I doubt it's worth that.

Wild Things 2

I'm not even gonna run the list of creative talent, because they should all be embarassed. Not for making a T&A movie, but for making a T&A movie badly. And that's pretty hard to do. In fact, before watching this idiotic film I would've said it's impossible. Well, turns out nothing is impossible. This movie sucks, and in the worst way possible.

-L

TV Time

I actually caught new episodes of a TV series tonight, well, two series to be exact. First was the new animated adult comedy, Father of the Pride. Now, it wasn't bad, really, but the fact that it's animated leads me to believe two things, it'll attract kids, and it'll try to imitate other successful animated shows. Neither of which will be good. Popular shows like the ones on Adult Swim have made it trendy to write edgy cartoons for an older audience, but trying to capitalize on that just for the sake of it seems idiotic, and we all know the networks can never go where cable can, so why try? As for the kids thing, this is marketed to adults, but being on a network, and being in primetime will just lead to failure for the show, parents won't much care for the subject matter. Which is really a shame, because the show had its moment, and I laughed out loud at times. It was worth it just to hear "bitch" from a cartoon on network TV.

The other was Scrubs, which is the funniest show on TV, and this episode proved it. Last season was a bit lackluster, and it felt like NBC just didn't know what to do with the show. Hopefully we'll see something great this year, as it could very well fall into the ranks of sitcom history as one of the best shows, and longest, to ever air. I honestly hope this show lasts a decade or more. The writing is always fresh, the characters are well rounded, and feel very human, the jokes are actually funny, and it's got that quirkyness to it that just makes me love it so much more than any other show I've ever sat down to watch. This is some great TV here folks.

Oh, and unlike Tom the Dog (see his recent musings, to the right) I don't think Heather Graham is all that bad. She seemed to hold up okay during the course of the show.

-L

A Book about Michaels

It's really what this should have been called. We've got Mike Mauser teaming up with Ms. (Michael) Tree, and a two pages spread every issue from Mike Grell paying tribute to Mickey Spillane's Mike Hammer.

In stead the went with the much cooler:

The P.I.'s: Michael Mauser and Ms. Tree #1-3 $1.25 (Cover on each)

Creative Team: Max Collins, Joe Stanton, with inks by Terry Beatty, colors by Wendy Fiore, and letters by Ken Bruzenak

What's it about? After pissing a fewpeople off, Ms. Tree moves her agency to a temporary home, unfortunately it's directly below the office of one Michael Mauser. The two are visited by a fueding husband and wife team (Ms. Tree by the husband, Mauser by the wife.) who both believe the other is cheating. After relaying their tales to the detectives, both agree to take the job, neither knowing it would lead them to cross paths.

You see, Woody and Simone (the husband and wife) met ten years ago, oddly enough at a comic book shop, and immediately fell in love. They did what every comic book geek does and started a fanzine (or, today, a blog!) and eventually pledge their love for eachother. Once married they have trouble concieving and begin bickering about whether adoption is a better choice. Naturally they both grow distant, which leads them here, hiring detectives to follow the other around because of the belief that they're cheating. Whew, that was rather long winded, and it's not even the first issue.

Both Woody and Simone come up with a plan to retain an old piece of comic artwork in an attempt to win back eachother, but all hell breaks loose and the two are found literally holding the gun. It seems their local retailer, Kosmo Kasmic, has been dealing in forged artwork, and now the Kirby's are suspect number one.

The race is on for the dynamic team of Mauser and Tree to prove their clients innocence and catch the real culprit. The story leads them to the underbelly of the comic collecting community, Conventions! The end has a bit of a twist, that I won't spoil, but I do wanna add that each issues Mickey Spillane tribute is great, giving background on the character he created, Mike Hammer.

Why you should read it: Because entertaining detective comics are hard to come by. Because Mike Grell's tribute pages are fantastic. Because the dialogue and character interaction are witty, and very realistic. Because the art is pretty durned good. Because when Simone asks Woody does he love her, his response is: "More than a complete run of Tales From the Crypt."

There are plenty of reasons to like this book, and I think it's something that everyone can read and enjoy. It was published by First Comics, which has since ceased to be. Which is ashame, they had quite a diverse little library, and I've enjoyed every First book I've ever picked up. There's alot of great stuff in here, especially for "fans" of crime noir. It's not dark and moody, instead taking on a lighter tone, and taking loving jabs at the genre. It's not Elmore Leonard, but it's not trying to be.

Next time your quarter bin diving, look for this series, or any of the old First books, they're well worth the money, and are entertaining as hell.

-L

Listy List List

Not much headed to the stores today, but here's some of the better DVD's you can pick up:

Invader Zim Volume 2: Progressive Stupidity

This one's actually been available at Best Buy for rwo weeks now. Still, it's quite an enjoyable cartoon, one for the whole family.

The Lion King II: Simba's Pride (Special Edition)

To complete your Lion King Collection!

The Passion of The Christ

I didn't go see this because I knew how it ended. I might take a look at it on DVD, but I doubt I'll buy it. There's also a slew of other "Jesus" DVD's meant to capitalize on this release. Nothing shows faith better than money grubbing.

Rocky & Bullwinkle Volumes 1 & 2

I'm pretty sure you can buy Vol. 2 seperately as well, but I didn't find a listing for it.

South Park: The Passion of the Jew

Now, this is a good little DVD. I've seen the episodes within, and laughed my ass off. It seems to be a waste of money though, considering most fans will just buy the Season sets. Or, maybe Parker and Stone are just proving they can grub money just as well as Christians.

Star Trek The Original Series: Season One

The must really think consumers are idiots. "The Original Series?" No shit, man! Is that why I see William Shatner and Leonard Nimoy? Man, I thought this was "Star Trek: The Priceline Commercials."

Touched By An Angel: The Complete First Season

It was in a good way, I swear.

Toxic Crusaders: The Movie

A collection of the cartoon series, includes only a few episodes though.

Trekkies 2

Well, I guess maybe Star Trek fans are idiots, thus the labeling of their Holy Grail. This will just make you feel sorry for them.

Twisted

Typical Ashley Judd film. Sam Jackson co-stars.



That about does it. I'll be back with a review or two. This time I promise.

-L

Happy anniversary!

CBG is having a celebration, so do yourself a favor and stop by there. They've got a crap-load of merchandise to sell, which irritates me, since I have no money right now!!!! Still they've got tons of sets going for el cheapo prices, and some of them are ever worth it. (Insert smiley face here...stupid HTML).

ADD has a review of Morrison and Quitley's new mini, We3. Needless to say he hated it. No...wait, that's right, HE FRIGGIN' LOVED IT. And rightfully so, it's probably one of the eeriest books I'm likely to ever read.

Also, and this will probably be printed at CBG as well, here's a little something I had to say about the best damn website on the planet:

CBG and Me

I literally came upon Comic Book Galaxy by sheer accident, and it wasn't even the website, it was the old Delphi Forum. Here was agroup of people who not only read my fanboy books, but were also hip to some of the smartest books on the planet. They spouted out names like Kolchalka, Los Bros. Hernandez, Chris Ware, along with names I recognized, Alan Moore, Brian Bendis, Garth Ennis, and even the likes of Chris Claremont, Frank Miller, and many other old favorites.

While I often disagreed (at the time) with some of their views, I finally felt like I'd found a home on the web. Here were people that were interested in meaningful conversations about comics, and they read books that could literally change your life, and in the very next post they'd talk about the X-men, or Spider-Man.

For someone who's always felt out of place in the fanboy world, this was a dream come true. Still, this was before I'd become hooked on ADD's blog, and hung on the words of D. Emerson Eddy (who we definitely don't hear much from these days, which is extremely sad).

Once I found the reviews, blogs, recommendations, I was hooked for life. In the few years I've "known" Alan he's influenced my buying habits more than any other single force. Thanks to him I truly discovered how vast and far comics can reach.

Not to say my mind wasn't always curious, but like most things (be they good are bad), all one needs is a push, and Mr. Doane provided that push. It was like rediscovering comics all over again, like finding there was a whole new, unexplored world out there. Well, it's been a few years since then, and my tastes have changed, which I'll forever fault Alan for, and here we are, celebrating CBG's anniversary.

It's a testament to how wonderful everyone who's been involved with Comic Book Galaxy is, that it has made it through the toughest of times, and even been resurrected from the dead, which fits right into the Comic Book World. In comics dead is never dead, even if you see the headless body.

I'd like to thank everyone at the Galaxy, both past and present contributors, for the tremendous influence it's had on my life. Hopefully we'll see it last through another five years, and if not, I'm sure we're likely to see all the names associated with it in some from or fashion.

You just cannot keep the passion these people have for comics caged for very long.

Thanks guys, best wishes,

-Logan Polk

Be back in a few with some word on a very old miniseries.

-L

Alien 3

This is by far the most underrated of the Alien franchise, hell it might be one of the most underrated films of all time. For the doubter, I direct you to the recent Special Edition, which includes two versions of the movie. First is the standard release, which most people loathed, and for good enough reasons, but the recut version makes a decent film into a masterpiece.

First let's talk about the one thing everyone seems to hate, the death of Hicks and Newt. I'll assume I'm not going to spoil it for anyone. I know, especially at the time, it was seen as a sever slap in the face to James Cameron, which I just don't get. Cameron made his film as different as possible from Alien so that it would have its own identity, and no one faults him for that. Hell, it might be the best sequel ever put to film. Yet, Fincher gets blamed for everything that people dislike about Alien 3? First of all, he directed it, he didn't wrote the screenplay. The original draft (which was much cooler, maybe I'll get to that later) was written by Vincent Ward, and then further altered by David Giler and Walter Hill.

Fincher was a pretty big music video and commercial director by then, and he came onto the picture pretty late in the process. I think he was third choice, possibly even fourth, to direct, which doesn't bode well. When two or three people have walked away from the project before you, you know it's going to be troublesome.

(Side note: All the Alien movies, including the recent AvP have come into trouble once principle photography wrapped. Both Fincher and AvP director Paul W S Anderson walked before editing was done, Cameron had numerous troubles with his first DP, and the studio, and Alien almost never got off the ground to begin with, on top of the studio constantly tying things up for Scott.)

Still, the idea was to make the movie its own, not to make it a rehash of James Cameron's film. Good or bad, that's something alot of sequels don't attempt. Of course, Alien 3's lack of success could have alot to do with that fact.

Next, most people have a problem with the mood and character of the picture, claiming it was much darker in tone. Now this, I just don't get. I do get that every character outside of Ripley is infinitely flawed, but for me that's part of the picture's beauty. Now, as for the lack of character development, again, it all fell by the wayside during editing, after Fincher had walked. Hell, it was part of the reason he walked.

So, with no one left to fight for Fincher's original cut, the studio proceeded to butcher the film. There's still alot missing from the special edition, but you get a far better idea of where it was going, and who the characters are.

As for Ripley's death? When Aliens got greenlit Weaver stated she wanted to die in the film. Fortunately she didn't, but when Alien 3 began filming she wouldn't sign on unless she got killed. So, anyone seeking to blame Fincher or the screenwriter for that little idea, I just saved you some breath.

Back to the movie...I think alot of people just don't see the beauty of the film. The fact that these forgotten men are now fighting for their lives, in a way redeeming themselves. In the original script they were monks instead of prisoners, and they seemed to be fighting something they thought was the Devil, which made a bit more sense. For some reason the studio went with the prisoner route (which was put in place by David Twohy I believe, who's ideas for Alien 3 looked alot like his script for Pitch Black).

Bottom line, this is an underrated film, and the DVD proves it. Had Fincher been allowed to see his vision for the film through, and Fox not taken it upon themselves to shit all over the writers and the directors work, we'd have seen a much more impressive film. Still, considering the first three Alien films were (somewhat) debut's for their directors, this one should stand as high as the others. It's a film that captures the darkness of humanity, and delivers a fitting end to a franchise. Unfortunately it would be ruined by Resurrection, but that another story.

-L

Bah!

Even more trouble with the links, all should be well now though. Damn you Blogger!!! Today's lesson? Always preview before you finalize any HTML settings!

Because one of you demanded it!

And someone else said "Why not?"

I just put up my first entry in my new Original Fiction Blog. The story is called "Last Stand," and as I said before, it's a western. I'm gonna try and make it into a serial type of thing, with maybe one small post a week, sometimes two if the mood strikes me right I suppose, or if people actually read it.

If you enjoy my blog at all, do me a favor and at least stop by. Comments would be greatly appreciated, be they good or bad.

I've got a ton of stuff percolating in my brain, including a few movies, and some old comics. Most especially, Alien 3, and The P.I.'s mini from First Comics. So, check back tomorrow for an actual post, and if you're bored, just click on the link to the right, the one that says "Last Stand."

-L

And now, for something completely different...

Well, not really.

Superpatriot: War on Terror #1 $2.99

Creative Team: Robert Kirkman, E.J. Su, with colors by Dash Martin, and letters by Rus Wooton

What's it about? Simply, a day in the life of a superhero.

This issue: John (that's be the Superpatriot) takes care of some baddie while attempting to rent some movies, mourns the loss of his children, spends some "quality" time with his wife, takes care of Hitler's brain yet again. Oh, and the hilarious return of an old villian.

Why you should be reading it: Kirkman's script is great, mixing touching moments, action, and comedy without a hitch, and Su's art fits the character nicely. I've always been a huge fan of the Patriot's, but I haven't followed Savage Dragon in some time, so I occasionally miss out of what he's up to. Still, I've enjoyed these occasional mini's, especially these last two, both by Kirkman. It's standard superhero far for the most part, nothing new, but it's still good fun. So, if you're looking for something brilliant, keep looking, but for fans of things like Savage Dragon, Invincible, or Capes, give this a look.

Unfortunately that might be it for today folks, unless something catches my eye, and I just have to talk about it.

-L

No time for reviews Dr. Jones!

Been a long day, so I'm gonna end it with a small review of a movie I watched last night.

Dummy

Director/ Writer: Greg Pritikin

Cast: Adrien Brody, Milla Jovovich, Illeana Douglas, Vera Farmiga

What's it about? Brody plays a discontented "everyman" (read: dork), Steven, who still lives at home with his parents and sister, and decides to finally pursue his dream of ventriliquism after losing his current job. Jovovich plays his best friend, Fangora, and frontman (woman?) for a band looking for fame, while Douglas plays Heidi, his sister, who also is discontent with her life, planning weedings for others while she sits on the sidelines of love. Farmiga plays Lorena, Steven's unemployment counselor, and eventual love interest.

Why you should watch it: It's a story about following your dreams, even if they might not seem logical, and no matter how many people try and hold you back, including your family. Who can't relate to that? It's brilliant in every way, which really surprised me. A film about a man with a dummy can either turn out interesting, or just creepy as hell. I loved the fact that Pritikin avoided the "best friend" angle so many love stories use these days. Steven and Fangora are believable friends, and never once does any sexual attraction appear between them, and when Lorena is introduced you know where the story is headed, but the characters are so well developed you quite happily come along for the ride. It's a feel good movie, but one that has more character and heart than any film I've seen in quite some time.I seriously could not stop smiling, and if you knew me, you'd know how rare a thing that is.

The DVD Package: I didn't get around to any of the DVD material (which leaves me with something to discuss another time!), but it includes a picture in picture ventriloquist commentary by Jeff Dunham, trailers, deleted/altered scenes, a history of ventriloquism, Dummies 101: Learning the Ventriloquism Dream, ventriloquism lessons, and the "What Type of Dummy are You?" Game.

This one's well worht your money people. Support the Dummies!

-L

Review Type Things

First, let me say, I was skimming through my blog and found an old formula I used one time for my "reviews", so, this will be new to most of you, but it's a fun return to my old ways for me, and I added a few things to the formula as well.

WE3 #1 $2.95

Creative Team: Grant Morrison, Frank Quietly, with coloring and inking by Jamie Grant, lettering by Todd Klien

What's it about? Simply put, WE3 is the storyof three household pets (a dog, a cat, and a rabbit) that have been trained as intelligent Killing machines by the government. Unfortunately the project has just been decomissioned, and the fuzzy little animals are to be killed.

This issue: Considering this is the first issue, that's pretty much what happens. We get to see the pets in action for the first few pages, and it's a creepy-cool feeling seeing them work. We also get to see them vocally communicate, which is very creepy. When Senator Washington meets the trio for the first time he experiences something akin to what we should.

Why you should be reading it: Well, it's a Morrison/Quietly book, and if you need more reason than that, I can't help you. However, the dynamic duo inject the animals with a stunning sense of reality. They move and act like the pets we expect them too, and because of that the fact that the assassinate and primitavely communicate makes it that much creepier. Quitley manages to translate everything you need to know by way of pictures in the first few pages, and you really feel as if you're in there with these creatures. With Morrison it's always the little touches that I love. The rats building a jet engine, brilliant. This is looking to pass Seaguy with leaps and bounds, which means it will be one of the years best books.

X-Men: The End-Book 1: Dreamers and Deamons #2 $2.99

Creative Team: Chris Claremont, Sean Chen, with ink by Sandu florea, color by Ian hannin, and lettering by Dave Sharpe

What's it about? The Last Days of the X-Men.

This issue: Primarily, it deals with everyones reaction to the Phoenix's return. One interesting thing was Claremont's usage of alot of Grant Morrison's ideas, and just the fact that they were brought up shows that he doesn't want to destroy everything the man did. We get to see alot of the things Grant put in place (especially Scott and Emma) as they would be maybe fifteen years down the road, realistically. We get to see a different side to Logan, and the Stepford Cuckoos show up, along with Martha. Honestly there's so much happening in the book it's hard to tell what's going on.

Why you should be reading it: Well, this one's only for hardcore, long-time X-fans. Which i'm not. I've found it hard to follow a few things because I haven't read every x-book ever written, but, Claremont does a damn fine job overall. Gone is his overexplaination of everything, and instead we get great characters who don't speak like they're reading a novel, and who interact with eachother in a very real way. Fans of old-school Claremont should quite enjoy this, if they can follow it. So far that's been one of my only problems. Another is Sean chen's art. While it looks good, it doesn't reflect any real change in the characters, it looks as though he's drawing current versions, and not future versions. That should make sense to the uber-geeks out there, the rest of you may have to for yourself. heh.

Venom/Carnage #2 $2.99

Creative Team: Peter Milligan, Clayton Crain, with letters by Cory Petit

What's it about? Well, seems Carnage has given birth, and his "son" will be born inside of a police officer, Pat. Carnage is determined to kill the thing, and its host, while Venom is out to stop him.

This issue: Black Cat rescues Officer Pat From Carnage's wrath, and it seems Spidey has gotten his wife to the hospital without a hitch (it was a cliffhanger last issue). When Pat goes after Cat for a robbery he ends up running into Carnage (who's been tracking him, of course) and all hell breaks loose. Wich leads to a new symbiote.

Why you should be reading it: You shouldn't. I was mildly entertained by the last issue, but this issue made my head hurt. The art is weird, and the story reads like it was written by a fifteen year old. I know Milligan can do better, so this book is officially out of my reading list.

That's it for now, but I've got a few more books I'm getting to tonight, along with a movie, so look for another update late this evening.

-L

Link Fest

I've been neglectful on my linkage lately, mostly due to having to constantly fix my blog. So, here's some interesting stuff happening around the web:

Mike Sterling had an interesting post on the 7 Deadly Harveys awhile back: http://progressiveruin.com/archives/
2004_08_22_archive.html#109323894185584669

Aplogies for the long links folks, but I'm an HTML idiot.

Also, a big thank you to Mike for mentioning this blog and my review of Madbomb. Of course, he misspelled it, but hey, we've all been there.

Dorian always has a few interesting things to say, and you have to admire how blunt he is: http://www.postmodernbarney.com/

Current topics include New Comics Day, and Space Lincoln. Yes, Space Lincoln.

It just occurred nto me that I'm going to get some odd search hits with the word "blunt."

Check out http://www.cinescape.com/ for Tony Whitt's new Comicscape column, which includes the rest of his interview with the Elfquest team of Richard and Wendy Pini. Here's hoping their currrent union with DCdoes bring out that Elfquest movie.

Tony's also got a review of Carnet De Voyage by Blankets creator Craig Thompson. It's well worth a look.

Mr. Bacardi has an interesting pic of the uber-hot Milla Jovovich: http://johnnybacardi.blogspot.com/

It's not worksafe, and has been known to cause heart attacks, so beware.

And most importantly, the Comic Book Galaxy is looking to raise a quick buck by selling of a few great items:

LOT #1: NEW X-MEN TPB VOLUMES 1-7. This is the ENTIRE GRANT MORRISON RUN in seven unread trade paperbacks, with art by Frank Quitely, Phil Jiminez, and others.
Price INCLUDING SHIPPING: $85.00 (combined cover price about $97.00)

LOT #2: SIGNED GARY PANTER'S JIMBO IN PURGATORY HC. This is the hand-signed limited edition with a tipped-in plate #159 of 400. A beautiful, gigantic oversized hardcover. Courtesy of Fantagraphics Books.
PRICE INCLUDING SHIPPING: $80.00 (cover price about $100.00).

LOT #4: SMALL FAVORS #1-3 and 5-7. Coleen Coover's delightful girly porno comic.
PRICE INCLUDING SHIPPING: $12.00 (combined cover price about $20.00)

LOT #5: FANTASTIC FOUR LOT. Recent Fantastic Four issues including Ultimate Fantastic Four #1-9 (Bendis/Millar/Ellis/Kubert), Fantastic Four #503-513 (Waid, Wieringo, Porter) and Fantastic Four Unstable Molecules #1-4 (Sturm/Davis).
PRICE INCLUDING SHIPPING: $25.00 (combined cover price about $50.00)

LOT #6: WARREN ELLIS'S SCARS #1-6 PLUS. You get the SCARS PREVIEW, SCARS #1-6 (complete series) PLUS you get an extra SCARS #1 SIGNED BY ARTIST JACEN BURROWS.
PRICE INCLUDING SHIPPING : $20.00 (combined cover price about $25.00)

LOT #7: ULTIMATE WAR LOT. You get Mark Millar's ULTIMATE WAR #1-4 (first meeting of The Ultimates and Ultimate X-Men) plus THE ULTIMATES #1 by Millar and Bryan Hitch.
PRICE INCLUDING SHIPPING: $7.00 (combined cover price about $9.00).

LOT #9: DEAD @ 17 VOLUME ONE. The first collection of the horror series DEAD @ 17 by Josh Howard.
PRICE INCLUDING SHIPPING: $11.00 (cover price $14.95)

LOT #10: THE FLASH BLITZ TPB. By Geoff Johns and Scott Kolins.
PRICE INCLUDING SHIPPING: $11.00 (cover price $19.95).

LOT #12: IT DISAPPEARS TPB. Nate Powell's dreamy graphic novel, the latest by the creator of WALKIE TALKIE.
PRICE INCLUDING SHIPPING: $8.00 (cover price $9.95).

LOT #13: THE DEATH OF SUPERMAN TPB. Come on, you know you miss the '90s. Dan Jurgens kills the Man of Steel.
PRICE INCLUDING SHIPPING: $5.00 (COVER PRICE $4.95).

LOT #15: UNTOLD TALES OF SPIDER-MAN TPB. Busiek and Oliffe's fun take on Spidey's early days.
PRICE INCLUDING SHIPPING: $12.00 (cover price $16.99).

LOT #16: AQUAMAN TIME AND TIDE TPB. Peter David's acclaimed mini-series collected in TPB.
PRICE INCLUDING SHIPPING: $8.00 (cover price $9.95).

LOT #17: ASTRONAUTS IN TROUBLE LIVE FROM THE MOON TPB. Larry Young, Matt Smith and Charlie Adlard's rollicking outer space adventure.
PRICE INCLUDING SHIPPING: $10.00 (cover price $12.95).

LOT #19: THE LOSERS MEGA-LOT. You get the ANTE UP TPB collecting #1-6 plus issues #7-12. First year of the acclaimed action series by Diggle and Jock.
PRICE INCLUDING SHIPPING: $21.00 (combined cover price about $28.00).

LOT #20: THE HULK GRAY #1-6. Loeb and Sale's neo-classic revisits the earliest days of The Hulk.
PRICE INCLUDING SHIPPING: $18.00 (combined cover price about $21.00).

LOT #21: SHUCK #1-4. Rick Smith and Tania Menesse's unique, delightfully pagan alternative comic.
PRICE INCLUDING SHIPPING: $10.00 (combined cover price about $12.00).

LOT #22: ULTIMATE X-MEN #15-25. Mark Millar's explosive final two story-arcs are collected in these issues.
PRICE INCLUDING SHIPPING: $20.00 (combined cover price about $25.00).

LOT #24: BATTLE ROYALE VOLUMES 1-7. This is the first seven volumes of the ultra-violent, near-future manga pitting society against its teenagers.
Price INCLUDING SHIPPING: $45.00 (combined cover price about $70.00).

LOT #26: THE FIXER HARDCOVER. Joe Sacco's latest in a handsome hardcover edition.
PRICE INCLUDING SHIPPING: $19.00 (cover price $24.95).

NEWEST ADDITIONS
LOT #27: HULK LOT. (VG-NM, most VF) Hulk Vol. 1 #377, 380, 383, 384, 386, 393, 394, 395, 398, 407, 408, 409, 468, 469, 470, 471, 472, 473. Hulk Smash #1-2 (complete Ennis miniseries). Hulk 2099 #7, 8, 9, 10. Thing/She-Hulk One Shot (Bryan Hitch art). Captain Marvel #2-3 (Peter David; Hulk guest stars). Dazzler #6-7 (Hulk). Marvel Super Heroes (silver age reprints of Kirby, Trimpe, Severin etc) #32, 33, 34, 36, 49, 52, 79, 81, 82, 85.
PRICE INCLUDING SHIPPING: $18.00 (cover price about $56.00)

LOT #28: AVENGERS LOT. (VG-NM, MOST VF-NM) VOL. 1 #88 (Harlan Ellison story; 1971), #100 (poor, cover detached, BWS art), #126 (Englehart), #270, 278, 279, 280, 283, 284, 285, 286, 290, 305, 308, 326, 328, 349, 353, 356, 375. Vol. 2 #4 (Liefeld/Loeb). Vol. 3 (Busiek/Perez) #5, 8, 10, 11, 14, 23, 28. #500 (Bendis), Official Marvel Universe Handbook Avengers 2004.
PRICE INCLUDING SHIPPING: $20.00 (cover prive about $40.00)

LOT #29: BENDIS LOT. Daredevil #32, 35, 37, 38, 39. Ultimate Marvel Team-Up #2-3 (Spidey/Hulk, Hester art, complete arc). Secret War Comm. Ed. #1, Secret War #2.
PRICE INCLUDING SHIPPING: $10.00 (cover price about $21.00).

LOT #30: THE AUTHORITY LOT. STORMWATCH Vol. 2 #6, 11 (Ellis/Hitch). Authority Vol. 1 #27 (Millar/Art Adams). Authority: Kev one-shot (Ennis). Authority: Scorched Earth one-shot. Authority Vol. 2 #0, 1-6, 10-13. Ministry of Space #3 (Ellis/Weston). PRICE INCLUDING SHIPPING: $17.00 (cover price $51.00).

LOT #31: STARLIN LOT. Infinity Crusade #1-4. Infinity War #2, 4, 6. Captain Marvel #17, 18 (David/Starlin). Warlock and the Infinity Watch #1, 2, 8, 13, 19, 20.
PRICE INCLUDING SHIPPING: $13.00 (cover price about $32.00).

LOT #32: X-MEN LOT. Astonishing X-Men #1 (Whedon/Cassaday). Onslaught: Marvel Universe #1. X-Men #55 (Onslaught by Waid and Kubert). Iceman #1 (of 4). Marvel Comics Presents Weapon X #72 (first BWS Weapon X issue). Nightcrawler #4 (Cockrum). Marvel Comics Presents Wolverine #9, 95. Excalibur #27, 28, 53.
PRICE INCLUDING SHIPPING: $11.00 (cover price about $21.00).

LOT #33: SIGNED ALAN MOORE BOOKS. Courtesy of Top Shelf Productions, TWO signed and numbered Alan Moore books: Voice of the Fire AND The Mirror of Love. A once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to own these two great books signed by Alan Moore.
PRICE INCLUDING SHIPPING: $105.00.

There's alot of good stuff there. I've already picked up 40 bucks worth of books, and depending on how quick I get some extra cash, and what's left, I may pick up a few more. I'd love to have the Untold Tales trade, but I already have most of the seriesin floppies, so it seemed pretty pointless. however, it's a good read, so someone should buy it!

If I were a wealthy man I'd be buying those signed Moore books. You also can't go wrong with that FF lot, damn good stuff in there. And Losers looks to be a good buy as well, everyone seems to love it. I'll get around to reading mine eventually.

So, head on over to CBG: http://www.comicbookgalaxy.com/index.html and buy something.

Also, ADD posted a nifty little pic on his own blog: http://www.comicbookgalaxy.com/blog/

You have to scroll down aways, but just look for the Flag. Good stuff.

I'll be back later with some reviews.

-L

And since I've got some time to kill....

I love writing my blog, and finding out that people actually read it just makes it that much more exciting.

Alot of people don't know that I also write fiction, none of which gets seen by, well, anyone, so, I had an idea. I've been contemplating it for well over a week now, and I figure it's either make or break time, so why not get someones opinion on it. I'm thinking about starting a fiction blog, meaning that a few times a week I'll post small bits of whatever story I'm working on (right now, it's a western), and if people read it, fine, if not, oh well.

Still, it would be interesting to know if people actually would read it. I'm not an artist, so there'd be no illustrations, but hopefully anyone who reads my blog isn't a "no pictures?! screw this!" type.

So, thoughts?

-L

Even More Review Type Things

I'm on a roll today.

30 Days of Night: Return to Barrow #6 $3.99

Final issue of the series. I won't spoil the somewhat surprise ending for anyone. I'll just keep saying what I've said before. It's beautifully horrifying, and one of the best books currently occupying rack space.

Caper #11 $2.95

I've enjoyed this run, despite what just about everyone else is saying. I've found it funny and adventurous. sure it's not gonna change the world, but it's not supposed to. Very entertaining.

Ultimate Fantastic Four #10 $2.25

Ellis might write the best FF I've ever seen. That's not saying alot, because I've never read a ton of FF book, but still, I enjoy his take on the main four better than anyone's, including Waid. However, his Doom leaves me lacking, and that's where Waid wins out. Not just on Doom, but on the series as a whole. He seems to have a better story going on than Ellis does here. Still, Ellis writes Ben and Johnny like no one I've ever seen. I was laughing out loud at the fantasti-jokes.

Guardians #3 $2.99

Still not sure why this is so damned expensive, because it would make a great read for kids. The story feels a bit forced in this issue, and it surprised me that they are actually going into space. The character interaction is great, but the aline dialogue feels stiff (but, perhaps it is supposed to). A solid read, and hopefully we won't see it cancelled before it actually gains an audience. If you plan on picking it up, keep in mind it is a kids book, not super hero flashy costumed stuff, and it's a bit over dramatic, because kids are over dramatic.

More to read, including: Venom/Carnage #2, X-Men: The End #2, Superpatriot: War on Terror #1, and WE3 #1. Also, I just got my comics from Lonestar in (pretty quick!), so I can now reread a few old incomplete series, including: The P.I.'s (Mike Mauser and Ms. Tree), Aztek: The Ultimate Man (great stuff here, everyone needs this book), and Troublemakers (I loved this book!). So, yeah, on top of everything else I've put off reading, like say, The Losers, I now have more.

-L

The Madbomb

Sounds a bit like some sort of slang, doesn't it? Yo, this is the mad bomb.

Captain America and the Falcon: Madbomb collects issue #'s 193-200 in a nifty little trade, with a sweet cover by the co-creator and writer/artist of the contained issues, Jack Kirby. Oh, and John Romita is along for the ride, at least on the cover.

Now, they don't call him Jack "King" Kirby for no reason. Anyone who's ever seen Kirby's work and has an ounce of sense will tell you he's the best thing that probably ever happened to the comic book industry. He's influenced 99% (gotta love those mad up statistics, still, it's likely true) of the artist working today, and it's probably fair to say that if not for Kirby there would be no comic industry.

Still, that's an argument/discussion for another time. What I'm here to discuss is Madbomb. For a story that was published about 25 years ago, it's got echoes of today all throughout the story line. It starts with Cap and Falcon arm wrestling inside a New York apartment when suddenly the two become infuriated with one another. Fortunately the duo come to their sense and eventually discover a tiny little gadget that's driving the neighborhood insane.

Turns out it was planted by a group of people calling themselves the Royalists Forces of America, who have a plan to used a giant madbomb to drive everyone in the country insane, and then take it over, thus killing democracy for good.

Of course what they don't count on is Cap and the Falcon infiltrating their hidden base, causing a panic, forcing the Royalists hand, and in the end (hope I'm not spoiling it for anyone, seeing as how the country is still somewhat under democractic rule) save the day.

Yes, there's tons of other little side adventures that make up the TPB, all of them involving the main plot though, which doesn't strike me as a common practice back then. Probably the most interesting tale is Cap falling in love with the daughter of one of the men they're after, the creator of the Madbomb. Of course it turns out that he was all but forced into the project, and thus not really a bad guy. Still, Kirby's use of emotion is always great.

Not that there aren't any faults to be found. Cap stepping out of an apartment window dressed in his gear seems a bit stupid on his part, the fact that there seemed to be the need to tie the villian in personally to Cap dumbfounded me, and the idiotic villians and their over the top ways just remind me of old James Bond films. Still, would you have it any other way? Nope, me either.

The book really shines during the action scenes, because no one does action like Kirby. The characters feel so much larger than life, and the villians seem so vile, even if they are over the top. The double page spread on pages 98-99 where SHIELD has finally take over the secret headquarters only to discover the evil mastermind gone was as classic as Kirby can get.

We have machines galore (nodody does machines like Kirby either) along with the Falcon in action, SHIELD agents rounding up what's left of the enemy, and Cap doing his best to point out the obvious. Sure, it's not a jam packed George Perez page, but it's probably my favorite page of comic art ever, or at least in the top five. Another good double spread is on 116-117, I'd swear Cap was about to roll off the page. Oh, and don't forget the action-packed Kill Derby issue.

The great things in the book far outweigh the goofyness of it. In fact, the goofiness is part of its charm I wasn't even around when these issues saw print, but it still made me feel like a kid again. That's not even mentioning the covers, which are so frantic that you start to feel like Cap's life is hanging in the balance if you don't read the issues.

This is a great buy for anyone who enjoys comics. It's written and drawn by someone considered to be the most talented man to ever work in the industry, it features an enjoyable story that still has relevence in today's society, and it's an all around nice package. It retails for about seventeen dollars, but over at Amazon.com they have it for a mere eleven bucks, which makes it an absolute steal.

This is definitely one that belongs in every readers library.

-L

Review Type Things

Looks like the Madbomb TPB will have to wait until tomorrow, but here's the skinny on a few fliks I've watched recently:

Revengers Tragedy

Directed by the talented Alex Cox (he wrote the screenplay for Fear & Loathing, and wrote and directed Sid & Nancy), this flik is based on a 17th century play, written by Thomas Middleton, and is a dark comedy about a character on a revenge trip. The director and/or screenwriter went the Romeo + Juliet route, updating the setting, but not the dialogue, which makes it a bit hard to follow at times. I found turning on the subtitles actually helps, seeing as how their accents make it difficult for a Yank like me to understand them. Fortunately it's filmed so brilliantly that when you don't understand the words you can still follow the story. That may sound a bit "dumb" to a few folks, but I think it's a testament to the director's ability to tell a story without dialogue. The cast is great, heded up by the wonderful Eddie Izzard and Christopher Eccleston (28 Days Later...), and the supporting players do a terrific job. All in all a truly great film, recommended to anyone who's a theatre fan, or to anyone looking for something intelligent. Just keep in mind it is a dark comedy, so it's racy.

Aliens

Still haven't made my through the entire set of special features, but the commetrak proved worth a listen, just for the cast members that pop up. Cameron's comments about Alien 3 miffed me a bit, seeing as how he wasn't exactly true to the first Alien film himself. Still, the DVD is loaded with more stuff than you ever needed to know, and it's probably the best sequel of all time.

Other ramblings...

Picked up the Marvel Legends Cable action figure this week, and was pleasently surprised by how articulated it is. Haven't been able track down the Deadpool, and given how much it seems to be in demand, I doubt I will. Stupid secondary market.

Also, I'm addicted to Mario Tennis on the N64. I'm afraid this might lead to an addiction to tennis overall. I'll have to watch myself.

Oh, and Dorian had some interesting things to say about the current "buy back my childhood" 80's trend that's going on. For his words check out PostModernBarney, to the right.

Now, I do want to address a few things, seeing as how I fall into that category, mostly because I don't really fit anywhere else. I do think there's quite a few valid points made, and overall I see the frustration, and if I worked where he does I would probably loose more customers than I could ever gain.

While I love most everything cartoon and toy based from my childhood, I'm fairly certain I can appreciate them for what they were, not what I made them up to be in my mind. I also loved the A-Team and Dukes of Hazzard, but I have no qualms about pointing out their stupidity. I do think he's wrong about Star Wars, but like most things it's a personal call. Just because you don't like something doesn't make it the dumbest thing in the world. Yes it's a kids film, and yes it's not the most intelligent film ever made, but there has to be something that makes it worth watching, otherwise it never would've made the amount of money it has. I refuse to believe that there was that big of a sci-fi fanbase when the movie hit.

Like most blockbusters it just appeals to a wide audience looking for entertainment for entertainments sake. The "prequels" have justproven how horrible a writer Lucas is to begin with, and that the man couldn't direct his way out of a paper bag. He's alot like Claremont, they've taken something the didn't really even create and somehow turned into the biggest pile of dogshit you can imagine. Still, the original films have entertainment value, and that's why people like them.

Some people just take it entirely too far, something I think I could be guilty of.

Back to the subject, I think he's right, it would be annoying as hell to listen to people talk about being true to the original when it comes to crap that was never even true to itself to begin with. I can watch any series of 80's toons and point out flaws left and right, but when I do watch them I choose not to, because that prettymuch ruins the entertainment.

Maybe it's just me, and it doesn't take alot to keep me entertained. Hell, I'm a DVD junkie with over 800 of 'em, you think all of them are A+ films? Hell no. One of my favorite films of all-time is the original TMNT movie. Why? It entertains me. It's that simple. Adventures of Ford Fairlane? It bombed, and rightfully so, but I love it. The trick is to appreciate things for what they really are, if it's crap, it's crap, you don't have to like it, but don't insult me for choosing to be entertained.

Not that I was being insulted. Dorian's got some valid points, like I said, some people just take things a bit too far, and unfortuantely he's in the wrong business to avoid that. So, if you're in his shop, do him a favor, save the Darth Maul vs. Darth Vader argument for outside the store, and don't ask him what his favorite Transformer was.

Oh, and according to Cobra Commander's biography he wanted to take over the world because he was a disgruntled used car slaseman who was tired of the system. Something like that. Now you know, and knowing is half the battle.

I always wondered what the other half was.

-L